Effective teaching style
Clear explanations, logical pacing, and structured lectures.
Amir’s Teaching PortfolioThis page provides evidence of my teaching strengths since I began my tenure at the University of Wisconsin–Whitewater in 2021. First, the overall average from evaluation forms (on a scale of 1 to 5) is presented. This average represents the mean of the median scores for all questions (Global Index). While the university provides various statistics, this metric is primarily used to assess faculty teaching performance. Second, for each course taught, a selection of constructive, positive and detailed comments is included to showcase the effectiveness of my teaching approach from the perspectives of a diverse range of students at both undergraduate and graduate levels. Finally, when available, comments from peer evaluations by other faculty members are also included for each course. All evaluation results are available upon request.
Themes identified in student evaluation feedback.
Clear explanations, logical pacing, and structured lectures.
Integration of practical tools, including Excel and Tableau, and real-life examples.
Engaging discussions, group activities, and collaborative simulations.
Open communication, detailed feedback, and a caring approach.
Well-structured content, clear expectations, and logical sequencing.
Activities and assignments encouraging critical thinking and creativity.
Wisconsin course scores are reported on the original evaluation record as the mean of median scores across evaluation questions (Global Index). UBC uses its own course evaluation record.
The instructor used the most enhanced way to teach his course and his class was very engaging and vnever boring and I would always recommend him to anyone taking OTM.
OTM 300 · Student comment 1 of 6
Student comments are reproduced verbatim, including spelling. Rotation advances every six seconds and pauses while you interact with the feedback panel.
Read all comments for this course